Jump to content

Espn 1000: Roberts talks are off


JimboHendry

Recommended Posts

It makes no sense for Mcphail to eliminate the cubs, even if he had a better offer on the table from the Indians. You don't eliminate the competition. You play them against one another as quietly as possible. The only reason you tell the cubs "no" is if you've accepted another deal. So unless we have another deal "done", this makes no sense unless Roberts has been pulled back. And at this late date, what's the deal about Bedard going first. After 6 weeks of this stuff, you'd think they would have come up with a way for that not to be the Sticking point. I smell Angelos, but hope I'm wrong.

I don't believe Mcphail would want to eliminate the Cubs..... The Cubs may be jockeying by using the media. But they may believe they cant get him for a price they want to pay...Value aside of course!:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest oriofan8
Much as I hate to say this I am starting to think BigBird should be banned as a troll and trouble maker. I don't think there is one person who post here that I belive less.

....This is almost comical !!! Stress-level overload is my diagnosis. I prescribe ice-cold beer in multiples of six....and don't stop til you see how ridiculous this all is. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....This is almost comical !!! Stress-level overload is my diagnosis. I prescribe ice-cold beer in multiples of six....and don't stop til you see how ridiculous this all is. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Dude Get a grip.... Find someone else to rip on!

Also I find this rumor absurd!

Brian Roberts Deal Dead?

A trusted emailer wrote in to tell me about a report today from Bruce Levine of ESPN Radio 1000. According to Levine, Brian Roberts is no longer available. The Orioles were apparently asking for Tyler Colvin or Felix Pie plus multiple pitchers, and the Cubs wouldn't do it.

Levine says the Cubs may turn their attention to the Rangers' Marlon Byrd or free agent Jon Lieber.

The Orioles took him off the deal ... Yeah right! Sounds like lousy speculation to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much as I hate to say this I am starting to think BigBird should be banned as a troll and trouble maker. I don't think there is one person who post here that I belive less.

I hope you aren't as selfish in the other parts of your life as this comment makes you sound here. If you feel that strongly about a poster, select IGNORE and problem solved. Wanting everyone else here to have to conform to your opinion, well, as I said, that's quite a self-centered position.

To stay on topic... I'm glad the talks are off, I didn't like the deal anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only wish is the BB would simply bother to clarify what he means. My only problem is that he seems overly cryptic and ambiguous... problems that just an extra sentence would usually fix...

Problem is, sometimes that extra sentence is what can't be said...I see your point though and it is valid but people have to understand these guys have to be somewhat cryptic with things because of the nature of the beast.

End of the day, they always say take it for what its worth or things like that....People need to do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, what has he been right about?

Pretty much everything that happened under Duquette and before that, he was right probbaly somewhere between 35-50% of the time.

You guys forget about a player move here and there and things like that. You only focus on a few majors things that don't happen and cry about it.

It is a lot more annoying than when they get things wrong and it is also why it was hilarious that Peace, BB and Belkast did what they did last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three comments frrom Roch's blog:

Sources report that the Cubs trade was finalized but Angelos killed it at the last second. Reports differ as to whether paperwork made it to MLB. The Cubs are no longer discussing a Roberts trade. Sounds to me Roch like you need to do a little research instead of just accepting the pablum the front office feeds to you.

Posted by: Dave | January 12, 2008 4:59

Are these the same sources that had Roberts traded to the Cubs a month ago? And had the Orioles preparing to announce a trade earlier this week? And had the 3 players from the Cubs wrong?

Posted by: Roch Kubatko | January 12, 2008 6:49 PM

Supposedly two of the "wrong players" were told by their agents the deal was complete. Maybe you should talk to the agents.

Posted by: Dave | January 12, 2008 7:04 PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No insider told us about the Roberson deal. This offseason, I'm fairly sure, Peace was the only one who told us what was going to happen and that was with the Tejada deal. Mad props to Peace for that! But name one other transaction that was called this offseason by an insider ... ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No insider told us about the Roberson deal. This offseason, I'm fairly sure, Peace was the only one who told us what was going to happen and that was with the Tejada deal. Mad props to Peace for that! But name one other transaction that was called this offseason by an insider ... ?

The Roberts trade...oh wait ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No insider told us about the Roberson deal. This offseason, I'm fairly sure, Peace was the only one who told us what was going to happen and that was with the Tejada deal. Mad props to Peace for that! But name one other transaction that was called this offseason by an insider ... ?

..... nothing else has happened besides those two transactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
    • The fact that they put this on the 1991 Donruss, perhaps the ultimate peak of the junk wax era, makes this even funnier to me.  If toilet paper ever shot up in price I wouldn't care because I've got heaps of '91 Donruss floating around. This is very true, which makes me thinks he'll get claimed somewhere else.
    • It's like the ghost of Chris Davis found him and has taken over his body.   I know bat speed isn't everything, but with the bat speed info that dropped, I took a look.  His average is 70.9 which isn't terribly slow, it's actually pretty average.   For whatever reason, he just can't square anything up.  I hope he fixes it but it's really tough to watch right now.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...